Police very cleverly implicated parents of Zahir Jaffer in Noor Mukhadam murder case: Khawaja Haris tells court

ISLAMABAD(National Times): Khawaja Haris, counsel for parents of Zahir Jaffer, prime accused in Noor Mukadam murder case told the court that the police very cleverly implicated parents of Zahid Jaffer in the case.

The bail plea of parents of prime accused Zahir Jaffer in Noor Mukadam murder case came up for hearing before single bench of Islamabad High Court (IHC) presided over by Justice Amir Farooq here Thursday.

Khawaja Haris argued what talks were held between Zahir Jffer with his parents on telephone cannot be presumed. Nothing can be said on the basis of sheer assumption unless credible evidence of talks becomes available. It is case of prosecution that the parents sent the body to therapy works for disposal. How can such thing be said without evidence on one’s own.

Justice Amir Farooq inquired has Therapy works been made accused.

The counsel told the court they are not witnesses. Therapy works was also made accused after 28 days of the incident. According to police challan the accused Zahir Jaffer was in contact with his parents. Police cleverly invented this story on their own.

The court inquired Zakir Jaffer and Asmat Adam Jee said what in their statement before police.

The counsel told the court the police inquired nothing from both of them during physical remand. According to police challan had Zakir Jaffer told the police earlier the life of Noor Mukadam would have been saved. Zakir Jaffer made telephone call to Therapy works at 7.05 o clock.

The court remarked if the call was made to Therapy works at 7.05 then it means the incident may have occurred between 6.30 and 7.

Khawaja Haris said Zakir Jaffer said to police during telephonic call the condition of Zahir Jaffer is not stable and police should take him with them. Prosecution has its own case that Therapy works people reached there after murder. According to prosecution the parents of the accused contacted Therapy woks after murder. It is my stance that the incident which occurs after murder can not be called abetment in murder. When murder had taken place then how could some one be charged in abetment in murder.

The court adjourned the hearing of the case till Friday.



Latest News
CDF Field Marshal Asim Munir warns India of ‘more severe’ retaliation next time
CTD Punjab arrests RAW-linked 12 terrorists, recovers explosives
Court seeks report from FIA on plea to register case against customs collector
Indonesian President Prabowo Subianto arrives in Pakistan for two-day official visit
Punjab intensifies crackdown on illegal number plates, tinted windows
IMF Executive Board meets today to approve $1.2bn tranche for Pakistan
Punjab braces for wheel-jam strike today against new traffic rules
Pakistan, Indonesia to hold discussions, sign MoUs in various fields




Multi Media   
DPM-FM Senator Ishaq Dar’s High-Level Brussels Visit: Key Highlights
 Multi Media
Embassy of Pakistan 🇵🇰 in Brussels || Quarterly Recap of Activities, Engagements & Outreach
 Multi Media
DPM Dar sends Trump peace prize nomination to Nobel Committee
 Multi Media
Pak Navy Chief Visits Foreign Ships Participating in Ninth Multinational Naval Exercise Aman | ISPR
 Multi Media
PM Shehbaz Sharif Addresses | Breathe Pakistan Global Climate Conference I 07-02-2025